Friday, August 28, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Why does Haiti have twenty Ambassies?
Taken from a discussion on the Rene Preval Blog on the above topic. Purely argumentative!
Gents and Why Does Haiti Have 20 Ambassies?
Flo is gone.
As I agreed with what she said in the post that you are addressing, I will try to respond for her. I have neither the time nor the inclination to put details in my answer (that was Flo’s specialty), but I will give you a broad idea of why I do think that she is right.
First let me respond to what I thought were Louinel Jean’s very interesting, yet problematic statements.
Louinel argued “the worst thing a poor country could do is to isolate itself from other nations” and “Isolation breeds poverty.” The problem with the first statement is that Louinel might have a very good point, but it is based on a misread of Flo’s statement.
Nowhere in her statement does she say or even imply that Haiti should become an isolationist nation.
She only questions the need for our small and very poor nation to have so many ambassadors, seemingly in many places that might have no real benefit to us. Thoroughly analyzing a person’s statement before answering helps the flow of a discussion, reduces fiction, and promotes collaborative efforts.
I am sometimes just as guilty as Louinel of not thoroughly reading a post, but I try to make up for it by offering a denial statement ahead of time, as I did with Flo and Djakut the last time they posted something that worried me. Sometimes I’ll say something like “I’m sorry if I misunderstood your argument, but here’s what I understood from what I read so far.” That kind of statement tends to keep the peace.The second more interesting argument made by Louinel is “isolation breeds poverty.” I simply disagree with this one, primarily because the evidence does not support it. Although neither Flo’s statement or my supporting statement said anything about isolation, the fact is that isolation can breed social stability and economic progress.
Isolation was good for Japanese economic stability and national solidarity.
It is during the period of isolation that the Japanese merchants developed a new national credit system that allowed them to become--by any standard--very wealthy.
It is also during the isolation period that independent farms and farming multiplied in Japan, which then led to the strong development of cash crops like cotton and tobacco that are now at the root of modern Japanese agriculture.
Today’s Japanese economy yields one of the world highest rice crops.
Another benefit of social isolation is that the national culture is protected.
As I stated many times on this blog, in my opinion a nation loosing its culture and national identity is worst off than a nation that’s poor (short version).
It is during Japan’s period of isolation that the Japanese samurai sword was perfected.
During this period, the Japanese use to promote the use of firearms in combat as something that is to be reviled.
It then became dishonorable to use firearms in any form of combat.
Rejecting the use of European types of firearms as cowardly and un-Japanese, the use of traditional weapons were encouraged; resulting in the Japanese Samurai sword becoming the best and most sought after sword in the world today.
Even after it opened itself to the international community, Japan still maintained a relatively secluded society.
You can get most of this info on the web, but historian Yuji Ichioka wrote a fairly good book about it.We also know that the Chinese were also basically isolated with all sorts of trade embargos against them, especially after the fall of Russia.
Look where they are today! Cuba is another example of (relative) isolationist success.
They are not as far as they could be, but even with the Giant (US) breathing down their neck constantly, they are still far better of than we have been in years.
It is not that I think that isolationism is a good thing, nor do I think that that was what Flo meant to say.
It is simply that perhaps we are a bit more realistic about the situation than you. Most people who know our history would understand the value of Flo’s question, and not be obfuscated by it.
Realistically:1. We all know that most of these ambassadors are doing nothing for Haiti--nothing at all.2. We all know that no real strategy or plan of action or real training was given to them, making their presence in those other nations futile.3. We all know that most of these ambassadors are just people who knew people who knew people.4. We all know that no serious research was done to determine where to place these ambassadors so that they could really be useful to our nation.5. We all know that for every two ambassadors who might actually care about making a difference for the country, there are five who are now living it up at the expense of the Haitian people.6. We all know that right now Haiti has developed nothing to trade.
No surplus of anything.
I am sure that a carefully thinking person could find better use for the little money we have.
You don’t rebuild a nation by running around with your little cup. You start by redeveloping the national structure and infrastructure, and by creating ways for your population to create trade goods…What exactly are even the good ambassadors doing? Are they again discussing how we are not self-sufficient and need help? Are they again passing our little tin cups? What has happened to our pride and dignity.
In my very humble opinion (maybe it’s the way I was raised) if you have nothing to offer, you stay in your corner and build on the little you have.
You only make contact with the most crucial outside elements—at least until you have something to offer.
I think that’s where I was going with this, and maybe so was Flo. I could probably go one to explain this further, but I don’t really want to. Sorry Jean-benito Mercier; I'll try to get to yours tomorrow.
Reply to: Msg 5215 Posted by Linda on 12/16/07 10:29 AM in respond to Louinel's argument on International relations.
Gents and Why Does Haiti Have 20 Ambassies?
Flo is gone.
As I agreed with what she said in the post that you are addressing, I will try to respond for her. I have neither the time nor the inclination to put details in my answer (that was Flo’s specialty), but I will give you a broad idea of why I do think that she is right.
First let me respond to what I thought were Louinel Jean’s very interesting, yet problematic statements.
Louinel argued “the worst thing a poor country could do is to isolate itself from other nations” and “Isolation breeds poverty.” The problem with the first statement is that Louinel might have a very good point, but it is based on a misread of Flo’s statement.
Nowhere in her statement does she say or even imply that Haiti should become an isolationist nation.
She only questions the need for our small and very poor nation to have so many ambassadors, seemingly in many places that might have no real benefit to us. Thoroughly analyzing a person’s statement before answering helps the flow of a discussion, reduces fiction, and promotes collaborative efforts.
I am sometimes just as guilty as Louinel of not thoroughly reading a post, but I try to make up for it by offering a denial statement ahead of time, as I did with Flo and Djakut the last time they posted something that worried me. Sometimes I’ll say something like “I’m sorry if I misunderstood your argument, but here’s what I understood from what I read so far.” That kind of statement tends to keep the peace.The second more interesting argument made by Louinel is “isolation breeds poverty.” I simply disagree with this one, primarily because the evidence does not support it. Although neither Flo’s statement or my supporting statement said anything about isolation, the fact is that isolation can breed social stability and economic progress.
Isolation was good for Japanese economic stability and national solidarity.
It is during the period of isolation that the Japanese merchants developed a new national credit system that allowed them to become--by any standard--very wealthy.
It is also during the isolation period that independent farms and farming multiplied in Japan, which then led to the strong development of cash crops like cotton and tobacco that are now at the root of modern Japanese agriculture.
Today’s Japanese economy yields one of the world highest rice crops.
Another benefit of social isolation is that the national culture is protected.
As I stated many times on this blog, in my opinion a nation loosing its culture and national identity is worst off than a nation that’s poor (short version).
It is during Japan’s period of isolation that the Japanese samurai sword was perfected.
During this period, the Japanese use to promote the use of firearms in combat as something that is to be reviled.
It then became dishonorable to use firearms in any form of combat.
Rejecting the use of European types of firearms as cowardly and un-Japanese, the use of traditional weapons were encouraged; resulting in the Japanese Samurai sword becoming the best and most sought after sword in the world today.
Even after it opened itself to the international community, Japan still maintained a relatively secluded society.
You can get most of this info on the web, but historian Yuji Ichioka wrote a fairly good book about it.We also know that the Chinese were also basically isolated with all sorts of trade embargos against them, especially after the fall of Russia.
Look where they are today! Cuba is another example of (relative) isolationist success.
They are not as far as they could be, but even with the Giant (US) breathing down their neck constantly, they are still far better of than we have been in years.
It is not that I think that isolationism is a good thing, nor do I think that that was what Flo meant to say.
It is simply that perhaps we are a bit more realistic about the situation than you. Most people who know our history would understand the value of Flo’s question, and not be obfuscated by it.
Realistically:1. We all know that most of these ambassadors are doing nothing for Haiti--nothing at all.2. We all know that no real strategy or plan of action or real training was given to them, making their presence in those other nations futile.3. We all know that most of these ambassadors are just people who knew people who knew people.4. We all know that no serious research was done to determine where to place these ambassadors so that they could really be useful to our nation.5. We all know that for every two ambassadors who might actually care about making a difference for the country, there are five who are now living it up at the expense of the Haitian people.6. We all know that right now Haiti has developed nothing to trade.
No surplus of anything.
I am sure that a carefully thinking person could find better use for the little money we have.
You don’t rebuild a nation by running around with your little cup. You start by redeveloping the national structure and infrastructure, and by creating ways for your population to create trade goods…What exactly are even the good ambassadors doing? Are they again discussing how we are not self-sufficient and need help? Are they again passing our little tin cups? What has happened to our pride and dignity.
In my very humble opinion (maybe it’s the way I was raised) if you have nothing to offer, you stay in your corner and build on the little you have.
You only make contact with the most crucial outside elements—at least until you have something to offer.
I think that’s where I was going with this, and maybe so was Flo. I could probably go one to explain this further, but I don’t really want to. Sorry Jean-benito Mercier; I'll try to get to yours tomorrow.
Reply to: Msg 5215 Posted by Linda on 12/16/07 10:29 AM in respond to Louinel's argument on International relations.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
South Africa- Hmmm!
Truly, in the Caribbean, we are in shock to see the level of violence that South Africans wage against their neighbors. We are really saddened by the death of over fifty persons from neighboring countries; they died because they were immigrants, not for any crime against South Africa. They are killed because they were searching for life in a place they thought was better than their own. But the people of South Africa told them that to remain there could mean the most humiliating insults and death. We have heard of people being killed and thrown into fire. This is quite symbolic; it means that this place that those immigrants considered their heaven was in fact their hell.
After apartheid South Africa has been considered a symbol of peace and prosperity in the continent, but the latest waves of violence against foreign nationals raise the question of whether or not the south still holds its moral bearings on issues of human rights and social justice, not withstanding globalization which promotes the movement of professionals across borders. What makes the situation more alarmant is that the government of President Mbeki did very little to ensure the safety of those who took refuge under their wings. Now South Africa must be very careful that it does not fall under the same category as to what happened to the Jews under Adolph Hitler. The South African government should have confronted xenophobic violence with the same firmness that it would deploy if the country were attacked by a foreign army.
South Africa reveals itself a weak state, so weak that one should ask if it will be safe enough to host the world for the World Cup in 2010. If you are killing foreigners, how do you expect to host the world for such a big event as the World Cup? What makes those foreigners that you are killing less deserving of your protection? How comfortable will you want the world to be when they invade your hotels during the event? These are among others the questions that the South African government should answer.
Really, the world media must be swift to question the ability of the South African government’s to put certain level of lawlessness under control. In case of violence during the World Cup how long will you take before you act against it? It is really disturbing to many people in the Caribbean who wish to know why nothing concrete was done to stop the xenophobic violence that was waged against immigrants who simply wished they were asked to leave.
South Africa! South Africa! South Africa! Don’t forget the history and the reality that you represent to Africans and to the world! You are a land of inspiration, a land of forgiveness and grace, a land of love and reconciliation.
So when we see you kill 56 immigrants for the mere fact of their status we wonder what has happened to your deep sense of decency and pride. We want to question whether or not you are going to bow to the infamous culture of war and death that has plagued the mother land for many decades.
South Africans, you are strong don’t give in to the weakness of wickedness!
After apartheid South Africa has been considered a symbol of peace and prosperity in the continent, but the latest waves of violence against foreign nationals raise the question of whether or not the south still holds its moral bearings on issues of human rights and social justice, not withstanding globalization which promotes the movement of professionals across borders. What makes the situation more alarmant is that the government of President Mbeki did very little to ensure the safety of those who took refuge under their wings. Now South Africa must be very careful that it does not fall under the same category as to what happened to the Jews under Adolph Hitler. The South African government should have confronted xenophobic violence with the same firmness that it would deploy if the country were attacked by a foreign army.
South Africa reveals itself a weak state, so weak that one should ask if it will be safe enough to host the world for the World Cup in 2010. If you are killing foreigners, how do you expect to host the world for such a big event as the World Cup? What makes those foreigners that you are killing less deserving of your protection? How comfortable will you want the world to be when they invade your hotels during the event? These are among others the questions that the South African government should answer.
Really, the world media must be swift to question the ability of the South African government’s to put certain level of lawlessness under control. In case of violence during the World Cup how long will you take before you act against it? It is really disturbing to many people in the Caribbean who wish to know why nothing concrete was done to stop the xenophobic violence that was waged against immigrants who simply wished they were asked to leave.
South Africa! South Africa! South Africa! Don’t forget the history and the reality that you represent to Africans and to the world! You are a land of inspiration, a land of forgiveness and grace, a land of love and reconciliation.
So when we see you kill 56 immigrants for the mere fact of their status we wonder what has happened to your deep sense of decency and pride. We want to question whether or not you are going to bow to the infamous culture of war and death that has plagued the mother land for many decades.
South Africans, you are strong don’t give in to the weakness of wickedness!
Saturday, May 10, 2008
DARFUR :WILL,WAR,WHEN
Looking at this title on a blog from the Caribbean may trigger an interrogation; what does Darfur have to do with Caribbean issues? Darfur's distance and our lack of media coverage of the prevailing conditions (hunger, rape, and murder) may serve to validate our decision to cast a 'blind eye' on this genocide. Yes, I said genocide; the argument about whether or not it has reached this point is incredible. A recent report by the BBC states that the total number of murders now stands at approximately 300,000 people, not withstanding over 20,000 reported cases of rape and children reduced to their skeletal structure before crumbling to dust while war lords and their legions wrestle for power. This is GENOCIDE!
I could not continue to write about Haiti and other concerns of the Caribbean while our brothers and sisters are living under the threat of extinction. It has been said that 'a nation never dies' but when we consider a situation as the one described above, death is a daily prescription for the nation of Darfur; and this, at the conscious negligence of the most powerful nations on the planet.
Now, we must address the issue of WILL as it happens to be the motivating factor for change. We know without a doubt, that it is the will of the people of Darfur to live and dream, to labor and harvest, to raise their children in an environment of peace, justice and hope. But we are not quite sure whether it is the will of those who have the power, to help trigger the radical changes that are so desperately needed. We see a lack of will because it is not a lack of resource or capacity to bring about a new day for the people and send a clear message that the civilian people of Darfur are precious to the Human family and that the have the right to life. That oppression and misery in one part of our planet is a global threat that we should tackle with decisive action now and always. Let us not reinvent another Rwanda. If the rich nations could unite to fight a senseless war in Iraq, and with all the necessary resource that could be, why is it okay for this genocide to remain in Darfur? And what is the rational for remaining so passive towards it? These are questions that must be answered if we are going to really make poverty and extremism history.
The last question is when? When is the world’s going to see policies that mean real change to their conditions. There are steps that have been taken to find alternative energy such the cultivation of corn for fuel. But why was such decision taken without regard to the survival of the majority of the world’s population that lives on less then $5 a day. Now the world faces a food crisis that announces itself to be deadly. What is going on is world preparing itself for a global catastrophe or famine? What will happen to people in crisis such as those in Darfur, Iraq and many more? It is time create change, but first to scrutinize global leadership and see how they match with the principles of democracy, human right and Justice. We need to act with a sense of urgency because the need of the people of Darfur is urgent.
I could not continue to write about Haiti and other concerns of the Caribbean while our brothers and sisters are living under the threat of extinction. It has been said that 'a nation never dies' but when we consider a situation as the one described above, death is a daily prescription for the nation of Darfur; and this, at the conscious negligence of the most powerful nations on the planet.
Now, we must address the issue of WILL as it happens to be the motivating factor for change. We know without a doubt, that it is the will of the people of Darfur to live and dream, to labor and harvest, to raise their children in an environment of peace, justice and hope. But we are not quite sure whether it is the will of those who have the power, to help trigger the radical changes that are so desperately needed. We see a lack of will because it is not a lack of resource or capacity to bring about a new day for the people and send a clear message that the civilian people of Darfur are precious to the Human family and that the have the right to life. That oppression and misery in one part of our planet is a global threat that we should tackle with decisive action now and always. Let us not reinvent another Rwanda. If the rich nations could unite to fight a senseless war in Iraq, and with all the necessary resource that could be, why is it okay for this genocide to remain in Darfur? And what is the rational for remaining so passive towards it? These are questions that must be answered if we are going to really make poverty and extremism history.
The last question is when? When is the world’s going to see policies that mean real change to their conditions. There are steps that have been taken to find alternative energy such the cultivation of corn for fuel. But why was such decision taken without regard to the survival of the majority of the world’s population that lives on less then $5 a day. Now the world faces a food crisis that announces itself to be deadly. What is going on is world preparing itself for a global catastrophe or famine? What will happen to people in crisis such as those in Darfur, Iraq and many more? It is time create change, but first to scrutinize global leadership and see how they match with the principles of democracy, human right and Justice. We need to act with a sense of urgency because the need of the people of Darfur is urgent.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Haiti, La Peur Et Le Declin Soutenus
Do you understand what is taking place in Haiti right now? In fact, it is nothing new: Elected officials take refuge behind nominated officials to 'fool' the people.
Why did Alexis get fired so late? What is the rational for deposing him, considering that his politics was approved by parliament recently? This is a reactionary parliament which acts by instinct, no real mass behind their decisions. they take action because they are afraid to lose their own job. Remenber! They did not show real concern for the deterioration of the living conditions of the people which many organizations have been voicing for nearly six months.
Instead they spent the time arguing on how to get rid of boulos, a senator who is retained as being tied to US citizenship, or fighting among themselves over petty matters. I don't believe that Mr. Alexi lacks the competence to do the job and do it well. And they know it too! For fear of getting fired by the people; they take action and there find the scapegoat.
The private sector needs to show that they, at least, have some understanding of the plight of the poor at this particular time in the History of the Country.
For too long they remain so passive and look at the masses with disdain. They could have collaborated with the government to see how they could help to curb prices on some most basic food items.This would have prevented the riots and looting of the pastweek. It does not seem that it is going to work like that any more. It cannot be that as long as you as a government official or a business owner is fed alongside your family, the hell for the rest of the nation which is the majority.
I have heard about so much dialogues between political parties in Haiti. Everyday you hear that there exist good dialogues between parties. It is obvious that these dialogues continue to be mere political cocktails that may have nothing to do with the hunger and extreme poverty that befall Haiti.
Any primary dialogue about Haiti after the elections, considering it as a post conflict territory, should have taken into consideration, the misery on the ground. Haiti has gone through enough political dialogs while the economic dialogue remains dormant. We must learn to love our neighbor as ourselves. Haiti can no longer be ruled within the context of exclusion, we must materialize the moto: "L’union fait la force" to rebuild it.
I will continue to do what I can for the few that I can, until the dream of the Haitian people is finally realized, until we move from the culture of mud and dust and build the skyscrapers of a Haiti, peaceful and prosperous.
Why did Alexis get fired so late? What is the rational for deposing him, considering that his politics was approved by parliament recently? This is a reactionary parliament which acts by instinct, no real mass behind their decisions. they take action because they are afraid to lose their own job. Remenber! They did not show real concern for the deterioration of the living conditions of the people which many organizations have been voicing for nearly six months.
Instead they spent the time arguing on how to get rid of boulos, a senator who is retained as being tied to US citizenship, or fighting among themselves over petty matters. I don't believe that Mr. Alexi lacks the competence to do the job and do it well. And they know it too! For fear of getting fired by the people; they take action and there find the scapegoat.
The private sector needs to show that they, at least, have some understanding of the plight of the poor at this particular time in the History of the Country.
For too long they remain so passive and look at the masses with disdain. They could have collaborated with the government to see how they could help to curb prices on some most basic food items.This would have prevented the riots and looting of the pastweek. It does not seem that it is going to work like that any more. It cannot be that as long as you as a government official or a business owner is fed alongside your family, the hell for the rest of the nation which is the majority.
I have heard about so much dialogues between political parties in Haiti. Everyday you hear that there exist good dialogues between parties. It is obvious that these dialogues continue to be mere political cocktails that may have nothing to do with the hunger and extreme poverty that befall Haiti.
Any primary dialogue about Haiti after the elections, considering it as a post conflict territory, should have taken into consideration, the misery on the ground. Haiti has gone through enough political dialogs while the economic dialogue remains dormant. We must learn to love our neighbor as ourselves. Haiti can no longer be ruled within the context of exclusion, we must materialize the moto: "L’union fait la force" to rebuild it.
I will continue to do what I can for the few that I can, until the dream of the Haitian people is finally realized, until we move from the culture of mud and dust and build the skyscrapers of a Haiti, peaceful and prosperous.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
The Caribbean and the Food Crisis. What solution?
The Caribbean prides itself in its tourism ,promoting stretches of white sand beaches , lush and push resorts and spa. So we prepare a paradise for our guests , but hell for our people. This constitutes the general interest of Caribbean governments while neglecting the most powerful employment industry of the region, agriculture . Contrary to what many people might think, the tourism sector does not provide jobs to more people than agriculture in the Caribbean. There are more people who earn a living doing their subsistence farming, and send their children to school. Yet governments remain oblivious to that fact. This is why the region has become a fancy economic field with a serious lack of touch with the kind of economic policy that would help to alleviate poverty through sustainable action. Everybody seems to just laying back waiting for the next guest to bring a bread. What a vision! Who?
Everyday we hear about people surviving with less than $1 a day in Haiti or elsewhere in the region.This is not fiction, it is fact and this is not fancy either, it has to do with real suffering, real children going to bed hungry and parents who feel like giving up because they see no way out. They see no way out because the way they have has been neglected by their government, their agriculture and the education of their children. We must not forget that more than one third of all those who live on less than $1 a day live and work in rural areas. Some of them are subsistence farmers or those who sell days of work to earn a meal.
I was born and raised in Haiti in a family with land enough to hire a few workers per month. I grew up seeing my father waking early every morning to reach his farm at 6 o'clock each day except Sundays. He is a man with undivided focus on farming and does it with all his might, yet he has nothing much to show for it at this point of his life and he is in his sixties. I recently encouraged him to abandon the practice because it does not make much sense giving your life to something that will only transform your sweat and blood into frustration. I have never seen the intervention of any government official to help in any way with the production of rice ,banana, corn and many other crops that are produced in my home community which is Thomonde. The paesants are left on their own to work the ground primitive style, Carry their goods on their heads primitive style, and sell it for nothing because the purchasing power of their communities are minimal to the smallest m. The "Republic of Port-au-Prince" is the best point where the peasants could at least gain some returns from their hard labor. But their is no proper road to transport the goods there. Those who manage to make it by the time they reach depends on the kind of product they they loose everything due to the deplorable condition of roads.
Now that we see rising food crisis around the world, the Caribbean nations should not be among the first to feel it based on the amount of water, and Arab land they possess. Haiti has nearly 10 millions people, with 80% unemployed or under employed. Why? Because the number one employer of the country is not really a priority for our government. Any government who cares about the need of the people, particularly in Haiti will first conduct the necessary research on how to strenghten the agricultural sector. If you come talking about tourism and foreign investment I know you are out of touch because .The read to tourism and foreign investment in Haiti will definitely be the organisation of our agriculture and a proper reform in our education system.
You cannot be eager to receive people in your house if it is not in order. The first place order is needed is in the belly of the people. As of now there is absolutely no order in the belly of the people ,they are HUNGRY. Any politics that seek to change Haiti and look at the peasants with disdain will pay a heavy price. Any ruling elite that think they can go ahead making profit while they sink deeper in despair and hunger is making a big mistake. Because the younger generation no longer believe you have the will to help them. So they will exercise the will to come to port-au-prince and fight. They will fight every body who is in the position to help make change ,but remain quiet.
Leadership is meant to give direction to the people, help them find their way. The Haitian people ,the Caribbean people are resilient people ;you can always expect them to bounce back from a bad situation,but we must fuse exuberance with discipline in order to lead our children to the destiny they deserve. They don't deserve the famine that is been passed to them,their need to be a certain level of generational responsibility. Have some concern for the next generation if you think this one does not deserve better. Haiti will rise again when we remember this lesson that we have learnt in primary school and actualise the lesson that " Haiti is essentially agricol" there we cultivate rice, banana, corn, "pitimi" patat0, zaboca, manioc, and much legumes. We must raise enough cows to provide milk and meat for our people, if we lack the seed let us get some from Africa. Let us get some cows from our mother land, Africa , and give our people some of the power and help them be proud of being Haitian again because ,at home they can not just survive but live.
I long to see visionaries in Haiti , in the Caribbean, not politicians to eludes the people to win elections.
Everyday we hear about people surviving with less than $1 a day in Haiti or elsewhere in the region.This is not fiction, it is fact and this is not fancy either, it has to do with real suffering, real children going to bed hungry and parents who feel like giving up because they see no way out. They see no way out because the way they have has been neglected by their government, their agriculture and the education of their children. We must not forget that more than one third of all those who live on less than $1 a day live and work in rural areas. Some of them are subsistence farmers or those who sell days of work to earn a meal.
I was born and raised in Haiti in a family with land enough to hire a few workers per month. I grew up seeing my father waking early every morning to reach his farm at 6 o'clock each day except Sundays. He is a man with undivided focus on farming and does it with all his might, yet he has nothing much to show for it at this point of his life and he is in his sixties. I recently encouraged him to abandon the practice because it does not make much sense giving your life to something that will only transform your sweat and blood into frustration. I have never seen the intervention of any government official to help in any way with the production of rice ,banana, corn and many other crops that are produced in my home community which is Thomonde. The paesants are left on their own to work the ground primitive style, Carry their goods on their heads primitive style, and sell it for nothing because the purchasing power of their communities are minimal to the smallest m. The "Republic of Port-au-Prince" is the best point where the peasants could at least gain some returns from their hard labor. But their is no proper road to transport the goods there. Those who manage to make it by the time they reach depends on the kind of product they they loose everything due to the deplorable condition of roads.
Now that we see rising food crisis around the world, the Caribbean nations should not be among the first to feel it based on the amount of water, and Arab land they possess. Haiti has nearly 10 millions people, with 80% unemployed or under employed. Why? Because the number one employer of the country is not really a priority for our government. Any government who cares about the need of the people, particularly in Haiti will first conduct the necessary research on how to strenghten the agricultural sector. If you come talking about tourism and foreign investment I know you are out of touch because .The read to tourism and foreign investment in Haiti will definitely be the organisation of our agriculture and a proper reform in our education system.
You cannot be eager to receive people in your house if it is not in order. The first place order is needed is in the belly of the people. As of now there is absolutely no order in the belly of the people ,they are HUNGRY. Any politics that seek to change Haiti and look at the peasants with disdain will pay a heavy price. Any ruling elite that think they can go ahead making profit while they sink deeper in despair and hunger is making a big mistake. Because the younger generation no longer believe you have the will to help them. So they will exercise the will to come to port-au-prince and fight. They will fight every body who is in the position to help make change ,but remain quiet.
Leadership is meant to give direction to the people, help them find their way. The Haitian people ,the Caribbean people are resilient people ;you can always expect them to bounce back from a bad situation,but we must fuse exuberance with discipline in order to lead our children to the destiny they deserve. They don't deserve the famine that is been passed to them,their need to be a certain level of generational responsibility. Have some concern for the next generation if you think this one does not deserve better. Haiti will rise again when we remember this lesson that we have learnt in primary school and actualise the lesson that " Haiti is essentially agricol" there we cultivate rice, banana, corn, "pitimi" patat0, zaboca, manioc, and much legumes. We must raise enough cows to provide milk and meat for our people, if we lack the seed let us get some from Africa. Let us get some cows from our mother land, Africa , and give our people some of the power and help them be proud of being Haitian again because ,at home they can not just survive but live.
I long to see visionaries in Haiti , in the Caribbean, not politicians to eludes the people to win elections.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
